
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strict, or Loose with your DTD Standards?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/</link>
	<description>BlogMaster Techniques and Social Media Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WebFadds.com &#187; WebFadds.com - Professional Blog and CMS website development services</title>
		<link>http://www.webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>WebFadds.com &#187; WebFadds.com - Professional Blog and CMS website development services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>[...] Strict, or Loose with your DTD Standards? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Strict, or Loose with your DTD Standards? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Frangos</title>
		<link>http://www.webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Frangos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Hi - I agree... we are in a loooong transition period, when you consider that XHTML has been around for about eight years now.  Maybe its the application of the &quot;concept&quot; of XHTML and XML the holds people back.  I mean, straight HTML tags are easier to grasp -- h1 for Heading size 1, b for Bold, etc. -- there&#039;s a more direct visual result from those tags. Even the advantages of CSS tables (less code, separation of content and styling) are easier to see than what the &quot;X&quot; in XHTML does.  Maybe we, as teachers, have to do a better job of making very clear the advantage of XHTML, in a visual and meaningful way.  You&#039;ve got me thinking about it (I teach at the college level)... thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I agree&#8230; we are in a loooong transition period, when you consider that XHTML has been around for about eight years now.  Maybe its the application of the &#8220;concept&#8221; of XHTML and XML the holds people back.  I mean, straight HTML tags are easier to grasp &#8212; h1 for Heading size 1, b for Bold, etc. &#8212; there&#8217;s a more direct visual result from those tags. Even the advantages of CSS tables (less code, separation of content and styling) are easier to see than what the &#8220;X&#8221; in XHTML does.  Maybe we, as teachers, have to do a better job of making very clear the advantage of XHTML, in a visual and meaningful way.  You&#8217;ve got me thinking about it (I teach at the college level)&#8230; thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenzjo</title>
		<link>http://www.webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>lenzjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/#comment-866</guid>
		<description>I actively teach and promote strict XHTML, but it&#039;s like swimming upstream at times. Take for example Dreamweaver. It&#039;s tutorial teach page layout using a table!!! Or when I designed my blog, I had to go to transitional because of plugins coded using table layouts.

XML, yes I agree it is the future - heck it&#039;s here now. It&#039;s relatively easy to learn, but requires experience to write properly without getting sloppy coding. This is from experience in trying to teach it. I think XHTML will be around for a while yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actively teach and promote strict XHTML, but it&#8217;s like swimming upstream at times. Take for example Dreamweaver. It&#8217;s tutorial teach page layout using a table!!! Or when I designed my blog, I had to go to transitional because of plugins coded using table layouts.</p>
<p>XML, yes I agree it is the future &#8211; heck it&#8217;s here now. It&#8217;s relatively easy to learn, but requires experience to write properly without getting sloppy coding. This is from experience in trying to teach it. I think XHTML will be around for a while yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloggingzoom.com</title>
		<link>http://www.webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>bloggingzoom.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webhelpermagazine.com/2007/11/strict-or-loose-with-your-dtd-standards/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Strict, or Loose with your DTD Standards?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Microsoft and PayPal are loose about it. Yahoo is strict. Amazon doesn’t do it at all. What am I talking about?  ’m talking about how these sites use and conform to web standards (namely, the latest doc type declarations — DTD — as specified by...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Strict, or Loose with your DTD Standards?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Microsoft and PayPal are loose about it. Yahoo is strict. Amazon doesn’t do it at all. What am I talking about?  ’m talking about how these sites use and conform to web standards (namely, the latest doc type declarations — DTD — as specified by&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
